摘要

• 2026年3月，社交媒體流傳一段訪談影片，片中文字宣稱印度陸軍參謀長德維韋迪（Upendra Dwivedi）承認向美國透露情報，導致伊朗軍艦被美軍擊沉。
• 經搜尋，原始片段由印度《第一郵報》（Firstpost）於2026年3月發佈，為德維韋迪與人對談的影片。
• 原始片段並未提及有關伊朗軍艦遭美國襲擊的內容，相應段落中德維韋迪的發言與網傳片段完全不同，口型亦有分別。
• 《法新社》（AFP）的事實查核報告將網傳片段判定為經AI篡改的深偽影片。
• 網傳片段中的發言與原始影片不符，並非真實影像。

背景

2026年2月28日，美國與以色列聯手攻擊伊朗，伊朗最高領袖哈梅內伊（Ayatollah Ali Khamenei）遇襲身亡，美國和以色列發動的一連串空襲已摧毀或損毀至少11艘伊朗海軍艦艇。^[1,2]

2026年3月10日，Facebook專頁「爱我中华/愛我中華/Love My China」發佈一段訪談影片，影片下方節目字幕顯示，片中身穿軍裝的男子為印度陸軍參謀長德維韋迪（Upendra Dwivedi），上方則顯示紅字「印度陆军司令公开承认 伊朗军舰在公海被美军击沉 是印度提供的情报」，帖文為相應標籤。^[3]同日Facebook用戶「Marketing」和「黄忠信」發佈圖片，圖中文字宣稱印度公開承認出賣伊朗。其中「Marketing」圖片畫面與上述影片吻合。^[4,5]以上帖文共獲得481個讚好、29個回應和122次分享，影片獲得4,225次觀看。

3月10日，X用戶「Compute King」發佈同一段訪談影片，宣稱印度官方洩露了剛參加演習的伊朗德納號的座標，導致該艦遭美軍潛艇擊沉。帖文獲得111個表情反應、18個留言、32次轉發分享以及1.6萬次查看。^[6]

查證

上述帖文中，Facebook專頁「爱我中华/愛我中華/Love My China」和X用戶「Compute King」均發佈同一段訪談影片，惟「爱我中华/愛我中華/Love My China」的影片屬垂直格式並加上紅字，「Compute King」影片的右上方則有微博用戶「战刀007」的水印。翻查微博用戶「战刀007」過往內容，該用戶曾於2026年3月11日發佈相同影片，但未提及訊息來源。^[7]

該訪談影片第16至32秒期間字幕顯示「WaiXingRen.com(外星人点看)」，經測試，前往該網址會轉至影片平台Bilibili用戶「外星人点看」的主頁。^[8,9]翻查「外星人点看」過往影片，該用戶曾於2026年3月9日發佈同一影片並於標題作類似宣稱，但未提及訊息來源。^[10]從影片解像度、發佈時間及字幕判斷，「外星人点看」這段影片為網傳片段的源頭。

在Google搜尋網傳影片左下方的文字「Raisina Dialogue 2026 Firtpost」以及德維韋迪的名字，可發現印度《第一郵報》（Firstpost）的YouTube頻道發佈於2026年3月7日的影片。^[11]影片簡介顯示，印度陸軍參謀長德維韋迪和印度觀察家研究基金會（Observer Research Foundation, India）副主席潘特（Harsh V Pant）在2026年國際論壇「瑞辛納對話」（Raisina Dialogue 2026）上對談，話題包括印度從早前打擊巴基斯坦的軍事行動「辛杜爾行動」（Operation Sindoor）中獲得的經驗教訓，以及戰爭不斷演變的本質。^[12]

檢視YouTube片段中的細節，包括左上角《第一郵報》的標誌、人物衣著、背景環境和英文字幕設計等，均與網傳片段一致。對比畫面內容，包括鏡頭、德維韋迪的位置、動作及影片下方橫幅的變化，可見「外星人点看」影片的前57秒與《第一郵報》影片第1分18秒至2分16秒的畫面吻合，僅在「外星人点看」影片第29至31秒及47至48秒顯示潘特的畫面有別。

然而兩段影片中德維韋迪的發言截然不同。根據YouTube自動生成的字幕，德維韋迪於影片第1分18秒該句所說內容跟辛杜爾行動及印度的決定性威懾（decisive deterrence）有關。而「外星人点看」影片對應的段落中，德維韋迪卻表示「我們正在密切關注伊朗的局勢。以色列是我們的親密盟友」。^[13,14]

Factcheck Lab檢視兩段影片相應段落中德維韋迪的口型並發現當中有分別。另外，觀看該段影片及檢視YouTube自動生成的字幕全文，並未發現當中有關伊朗軍艦遭美國襲擊和印度向美國提供伊朗軍艦情報的內容。

《法新社》（AFP）發佈事實查核報告，判定網傳片段為經過篡改的深偽（Deepfake）影片。《法新社》同樣指出影片畫面源自上述《第一郵報》影片，並使用語音克隆檢測工具對音頻進行分析，結果判斷99%機會為AI生成。[15]

網傳片段聲音與原始影片不符，並非真實影像。

結論

2026年3月，社交媒體流傳一段訪談影片，片中文字宣稱印度陸軍參謀長德維韋迪（Upendra Dwivedi）承認向美國透露情報，導致伊朗軍艦被美軍擊沉。

經搜尋，原始片段由印度《第一郵報》（Firstpost）於2026年3月發佈，為德維韋迪與人對談的影片。原始片段並未提及有關伊朗軍艦遭美國襲擊的內容，相應段落中德維韋迪的發言與網傳片段完全不同，口型亦有分別。

《法新社》（AFP）的事實查核報告將網傳片段判定為經AI篡改的深偽影片。

網傳片段中的發言與原始影片不符，並非真實影像。

假如這篇文章對你有用，請考慮付費支持。

你亦可付費訂閱，長期支持我們的事實查核工作︰

附錄：德維韋迪訪談影片逐字稿

使用Google Gemini輸入[11]中的YouTube連結及指令「提供這部影片帶有標點符號的完整英文逐字稿」，以下為生成結果。注意人工智能生成內容可能出錯，僅用作參考。

[00:00:09] Hello everyone and welcome to this very special podcast with a very special person. We have with us today the Chief of Army Staff, General Dwivedi, and we'll be speaking about the changing nature of war and how that has impacted the Indian Army. As conflicts rage around the world, as violence rages, hard power is back in focus in international relations. We are looking at a world that is increasingly turbulent and increasingly willing to use hard power to achieve political ends. This is a conversation we want to have with General Dwivedi as to how the Indian Army is looking at this changing context and how it is preparing for the future battlefield. General Dwivedi, welcome to this podcast.

[00:01:00] Thank you very much. So let me just first of all congratulate you on Operation Sindoor and its successful execution. But also, looking forward from that, what lessons has the Indian Army drawn out of the experience that we had as a nation and as an army?

[00:01:02] So, Harsh, firstly, good morning to you. It's a great privilege meeting you for the first time. I thought you were 6 feet tall, but you're really my height! Now, coming onto this Operation Sindoor, if I say that this is the first time where India decided that "decisive deterrence" will not work—we have to be very credible about it. So, the three things which are required for deterrence are credibility, capability, and the third thing is the will to wage war. This is the first time when we actually executed all that; that is the first lesson which I wish to give you. It was a "new normal," and we said this will now be a policy: that in case there is a terror action, the policy will be to retaliate under our own terms and conditions.

[00:01:50] The second issue which comes out is the synergy which we found was something which was very important. We realized it's not only the tri-services; it's with the intelligence agencies, the support agencies, the logistic stakeholders—with everyone, you need to synergize more. So the lesson is that next time when it takes place, we should be able to synergize much more.

[00:02:11] Just to move ahead, because of the warfare we saw this time, there is a requirement for us to make sure that the small space of the Tactical Battle Area (TBA) needs a different way of managing resources. That's why we refer to the term "littoral," where we need a different mechanism to completely control and identify what is from the enemy and what is on our side. These are three lessons I give you straight away. And the fourth one: bigger organizations and bigger deployments will not work out because they are visible. Therefore, you have to be small, you have to be self-contained, and only look at the mass effect at the point of decision.

[00:02:54] So General, if we take this conversation forward, as the character of war changes... one of the things that becomes very important is that we are continuously reforming and looking at our force structure and doctrines. Can you elaborate on the doctrinal and force structure changes you envision the Indian Army undertaking in the near future?

[00:03:22] Firstly, we have to be very clear that all tactical commanders have to become "techno-commanders." Technology has to be part of life; that is point number one. Second, platforms in isolation are no good; they have to be a "system of systems." Instead of just a platform, it has to be a capability platform.

[00:03:41] If that be the view, what I had decided was to firstly have synergy with what "Viksit Bharat 2047" is being looked at. We were lucky that the Raksha Mantri announced the "Year of Reforms" for 2025. So what we have done is identified what organizational changes are required, what doctrinal changes are required, and what equipment transformation is required.

[00:04:10] Any equipment transformation requires a long gestation period; it will not come within 5 to 7 years. You look at Rafale, naval platforms, or even tanks. So what we did was started changing the organizations. We have started with the Integrated Battle Group (IBG), the RDRA (Combined Arms Brigade)... because existing organizations cannot adapt very fast to change. Therefore, we need new organizations. We went for Shaktiman (the drone regiment), drone batteries, Ashni platoon (drone platoon), light commando battalions, and many such structures.

[00:04:54] When it comes to technology—which was the first point you made and which is certainly the most important element in contemporary warfare—as the wars we have seen in the last decade, how do you envision the role of emerging tech in warfare? Is the Indian Army now prepared to wage and deter those kinds of wars happening in multiple domains simultaneously?

[00:05:22] You absolutely said it. Earlier we used to have land, sea, and air, but now the domains have increased by exactly three more: cyber, space, and cognitive. If you look at these, what are the binding factors? This is the multi-domain operation. The first thing we did was that all our war games were standalone multi-domain operation war games so that there is a degree of awareness amongst all of us.

[00:05:49] As far as the year 2024 and 2025 is concerned, we declared it as the "Year of Technology Absorption"—to lay down the foundation. 2026 and 2027 have now been declared as the "Year of Networking and Data Centricity." The next two years thereafter will be Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. What does it mean? We can't go back; the change must come with the "velocity of relevance."

[00:06:16] In AI, cyber (including Electronic Warfare), and cognitive space, we have to move at a very fast pace. To give you an example, we are working with Agentic AI to be included. We already have predictive analysis and generative AI, but this is what we're looking at in the future. We already have the Battlefield Surveillance System and the Command Decision Support System (CIS) inducted. In space, we are working with private players and looking at Navic (as a lesson from Kargil) to incorporate as fast as possible. At the command level, we now have COSWW, so cyber deterrence is being promulgated as hygiene to the complete Indian Army.

[00:07:13] General, one aspect you started your comments with was synergy, integration, and jointness. We have seen this discussion on Integrated Theater Commands. What is your sense as to how that process is moving forward and the challenges in implementing that?

[00:07:39] During the Kargil war, it was generally felt that theaters are required; we have been thinking about this for approximately 28 years. The challenges? The ethos are different, the culture is different, networks are different, and working procedures are different. It takes time for all to get together. Starting from General Rawat, the first CDS, till date, we have focused on how to enhance jointness, and after jointness, the integration part will come.

[00:08:19] Is it on the right lines? My answer is yes. Training, policy, human resource cross-attachments, joint legal orders—everything is being taken care of, along with common logistic nodes. We are looking at stabilizing jointness first, then integration will be easier. I feel that 2026 should come out with good news for all of us.

[00:08:58] Also in terms of diplomacy, which is increasingly a part of defense forces' ambit... how do you envision the role defense forces can play in military diplomacy?

[00:09:46] I will quote our External Affairs Minister, Dr. S. Jaishankar. When he addressed the army commanders, he said military as such needs to learn a lot about military diplomacy. As far as the United Nations is concerned, we have been one of the top countries providing manpower. Our staff is the most sought after because of our conduct, neutrality, and assurance. Military diplomacy gives you mutual respect, mutual trust, and mutual assurance. Once you combine soft power with hard power, it becomes "smart power." Today we have 52 missions, and their task is to ensure our viewpoint reaches decision-makers and our defense exports increase. We also play a major role in Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) in neighboring countries.

[00:11:49] Regarding the Pakistan dynamic—in insofar as Operation Sindoor happened, there was a certain calculus of deterrence. Do you see a change of behavior in the way the LOC is operating?

[00:12:12] To be very frank, I'm not finding a lot of changes that were expected after Operation Sindoor. The Article 27 amendment has given complete powers and immunity to the Field Marshal. The polity has become subservient. What is happening today is a cause of worry for a common Pakistani. Is it martial law indirect? As far as India is concerned, we must remain alarmed and alert. We cannot take it for granted; we have to be extra cautious and always prepared for any eventuality with our western neighbor.

[00:13:21] Are you worried about the two-front situation? We have seen some diplomatic understanding with China persisting after Galwan, but how do you view the Pakistan-China relationship?

[00:13:58] Intentions can change, but capability cannot. In the case of Pakistan, it's often the Pakistani soldier pressing the button, but the equipment, the satellite information, and the AI network are from a different country. This interoperability and exchange of information is a cause of concern for me. When we talk about collusivity, yes, it remains a cause of concern. My preparation should be at such a level that I can face both fronts whenever the eventuality arises.

[00:15:02] There is a debate about "guns vs. butter"—defense being seen as a cost. How do you conceptualize national security as an enabler of economic growth?

[00:15:46] Nature is inherent with violence. Security providers make sure that violence is kept as far away as possible from common citizens. Security assurance is our primary task. Regarding nation-building, look at the Vibrant Village Program. We are bringing "soul" back to the first villages from the border through communication, skill development, and cultural revival.

[00:17:00] Also, economic development: the money the military pitches back to the Ladakh economy is much more than what tourists provide, because we buy from local cooperatives and run schools. Infrastructure development for the military also benefits tourists. We are shaping the next generation through the Agniveer program, training 30,000 to 90,000 people yearly for society. We run over 400 schools, colleges, and help with defense exports. When the Indian Army puts a stamp on a product, other countries are ready to buy it.

[00:19:07] Finally, with so many global conflicts, what is keeping you awake at night?

[00:19:24] There is only one challenge: you should not get surprised. You must be able to read events, connect the dots, and take preparatory actions. We keep discussing 4 or 5 scenarios. The time of execution is going to be very short, so the role play of every layer has to be pre-planned and pre-sanctioned. In Operation Sindoor, a 4-day war, we didn't have time for long discussions, but every soldier knew their role like an orchestra.

[00:20:28] Thank you, General. It was fantastic to talk to you. The scale and scope of change is so fast that we must be constantly on guard. Thank you for being with us.

[00:20:54] Thank you, great honor.

資料來源

1. 美以聯手攻擊伊朗致哈梅內伊喪生以及伊朗的報復性打擊——我們目前知道什麼？（BBC News 中文），Wayback Machine備份網頁
2. 衛星影像顯示：美以空襲重創伊朗海軍、導彈設施與核基地（BBC News 中文），Wayback Machine備份網頁
3. Facebook專頁「爱我中华/愛我中華/Love My China」2026年3月1日影片，MediaVault備份網頁。片中的簡體中文字幕為「我们正在密切关注伊朗的局势。以色列是我们的亲密盟友。伊朗海军舰艇被击沉确实很不幸，但这是在国际水域发生的。只要伊朗船只停留在印度水域，它们就会受到保护，但当他们越过国际水域时，作为以色列的战略盟友，我们有责任将确切位置告知以色列，这是我们新战略协议的一部分。所以，你认为伊朗海军舰艇是在印度境内被摧毁的，这是错误的。以色列在国际水域做什么，是他们自己的事。我们可以向以色列提供位置或情报，但我们没有参与以色列和美国的联合鱼雷攻击。他们办了他们自己的事。这是伊朗的战争，与印度无关。我们的重点仍然是巴基斯坦，以色列将帮助我们实现这一目标。」
4. Facebook用戶「黄忠信」2026年3月10日帖文，Wayback Machine備份網頁
5. Facebook用戶「Marketing」2026年3月10日帖文，Wayback Machine備份網頁
6. X用戶「Compute King」（@Compute_King）2026年3月10日帖文
7. 微博用戶「战刀007」2026年3月11日帖文，Wayback Machine備份網頁
8. 外星人点看，Wayback Machine備份網頁
9. Bilibili用戶「外星人点看」主頁，Wayback Machine備份網頁
10. 速报！印度陆军总司令（陆军参谋长）自豪地承认：我们印度出卖了伊朗，把伊朗船只的位置告诉了以色列，随后该船被美国海军攻击并摧毁！（Bilibili / 外星人点看），Wayback Machine備份網頁
11. India's Army Chief Speaks on Op Sindoor, Pakistan and Future of Warfare | Raisina Dialogue 2026 (YouTube / Firstpost)，Wayback Machine備份網頁。影片簡介原文為「At the Raisina Dialogue 2026, General Upendra Dwivedi, PVSM, AVSM, Chief of the Army Staff, spoke with Harsh V Pant, Vice President, Observer Research Foundation, India, on lessons from Operation Sindoor and the evolving nature of warfare. He said India’s policy is to retaliate against terror actions and emphasised synergy across services and agencies. General Dwivedi discussed organisational changes, including integrated battle groups, tactical commandos and the Shaktiman drone system. He highlighted emerging domains such as cyber, data-centric operations and artificial intelligence. He also addressed India’s two-front challenge involving China and Pakistan, warned that Islamabad's behaviour has not significantly changed after Operation Sindoor, and stressed the need for preparedness. Watch the full conversation on Firstpost. 」，影片逐字稿見附錄。
12. 印巴衝突背後的真正贏家是中國嗎？（BBC News 中文），Wayback Machine備份網頁
13. 見[11]中的影片第1分18秒起，德維韋迪所說內容為 「Coming onto this Operation Sindoor, if I say that this is the first time where India decided that "decisive deterrence" will not work—we have to be very credible about it.」
14. 見[9]中的影片第1秒起，德維韋迪所說內容為 「We’re closely monitoring the situation in Iran. Israel is our close ally.」
15. Deepfake video of Indian general shared with false claims about torpedoed Iran ship (AFP Fact Check)，Wayback Machine備份網頁。原文為「An Iranian ship was sunk by a US submarine off the coast of Sri Lanka on March 4, 2026, killing at least 84 sailors, but a video circulating online of India's army chief saying that the South Asian country had shared the frigate's location with Israel is digitally altered. The original footage shows the general discussing India's military operation against Pakistan in 2025, while detection tools found the audio track in the circulating video was generated with AI.」